Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Intensive Care Medicine, 2004; 30(6):1058-1065||en|
|dc.description||The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.com||en|
|dc.description.abstract||Objective To obtain knowledge about the conditions and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a collaborative network of Brain Information Technology centres. Design The Brain IT (Brain monitoring with Information Technology) survey comprised two parts: local conditions and policies (part A), and a case study part (part B). The information was gathered by written questionnaires followed by telephone interviews. Participants Twenty-four Brain IT centres participated (two respondents from 18 sites). Results The average proportion of agreement between duplicate respondents was 0.79 (range 0.44–1.00). All Brain IT centres monitored ICP. The reported order of treatment for intracranial hypertension was: evacuation of mass-lesions and head elevation (1), increase of sedation and Mannitol scheme (2), hyperventilation (3), ventricular drainage (4), craniectomy and pentothal coma (5), and decompressive lobectomy (6). The respondents were less prone to evacuate expansive contusions in relation to extra cerebral hematomas. The most common suggested interventions (alone or in combination) for treatment of intracranial hypertension without mass lesions was the Mannitol scheme (included in 71% of the suggestions), CSF drainage (included in 56%), hyperventilation (included in 32%), and pentothal coma (included in 22%). Conclusions The suggested management of TBI was mainly in accordance with published guidelines, although a minor proportion of the answers deviated to some extent. The suggested order and combinations of different treatment interventions varied. Variation of treatment within the range of prescribed standards provides optimal conditions for an interesting future analysis of treatment and monitoring data as collected prospectively in a Brain IT database. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2206-8||en|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||P. Enblad, P. Nilsson, I. Chambers, G. Citerio, H. Fiddes, T. Howells, K. Kiening, A. Ragauskas, J. Sahuquillo, Y. H. Yau, C. Contant and I. Piper||en|
|dc.subject||Head injury; Management; Survey||en|
|dc.title||R3-Survey of traumatic brain injury management in European Brain IT centres year 2001||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Medicine publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.