Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||If you do not know whether a real-world intervention will work, consider a randomised controlled experiment|
Meier, Andrew J.
|Citation:||Adelaide International public works conference, 21-25 August, 2005|
|Conference Name:||Adelaide International public works conference ( 2005 : Adelaide, Australia)|
|Organisation:||Centre for Automotive Safety Research (CASR)|
|Hutchinson TP and Meier AJ|
|Abstract:||In a randomised controlled experiment, some of the experimental units (e.g., people, schools, intersections, or suburbs) are randomly assigned to treatment and the others to no treatment. Randomisation is considered very important because harsh experience in many fields has shown how easy it is for biases to occur if any other method is used. Examples are discussed of realworld interventions that either were implemented in randomised experiments or where issues of methodological quality were prominent. Some of these are from road safety (road marking, areawide traffic calming), and some are from other areas of public works (including filtering of drinking water, performance of personnel, better street lighting for deterring crime, and project cost underestimation). Systematic reviews are an even stronger form of evidence than individual randomised experiments, yet there are serious difficulties in identifying randomised experiments in bibliographic databases, particularly as research methodology has not in the past been considered important in the indexing of engineering research. How to locate information on past trials of interventions is discussed --- both self-conducted searches and the services a library can provide.|
|Appears in Collections:||Centre for Automotive Safety Research conference papers|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.