Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Assessing the validity of computer-game-like tests of processing speed and working memory|
|Citation:||Behavior Research Methods (Print Edition), 2008; 40(4):969-981|
|Publisher:||Psychonomic Soc Inc|
|Jason McPherson and Nicholas R. Burns|
|Abstract:||Processing speed (Gs) and working memory (WM) tasks have received considerable interest as correlates of more complex cognitive performance measures. Gs and WM tasks are often repetitive and are often rigidly presented, however. The effects of Gs and WM may, therefore, be confounded with those of motivation and anxiety. In an effort to address this problem, we assessed the concurrent and predictive validity of computer-game-like tests of Gs (Space Code) and WM (Space Matrix) across two experiments. In Experiment 1, within a university sample (N = 70), Space Matrix exhibited concurrent validity as a WM measure, whereas Space Code appeared to be a mixed-ability measure. In Experiment 2, Space Matrix exhibited concurrent validity as well as predictive validity (as a predictor of school grades) within a school-aged sample (N = 94), but the results for Space Code were less encouraging. Relationships between computer-game-like tests and gender, handedness, and computergame experience are also discussed.|
|Keywords:||Humans; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Reproducibility of Results; Memory, Short-Term; Visual Perception; Reaction Time; Psychology; Video Games; Computers; Adolescent; Adult; Child; Female; Male|
|Description:||Copyright 2008 Psychonomic Society, Inc.|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.