Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/52139
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, D.en
dc.contributor.authorBarber, C.en
dc.contributor.authorMcLoughlin, P.en
dc.contributor.authorThavaneswaran, P.en
dc.contributor.authorJamieson, G.en
dc.contributor.authorMaddern, G.en
dc.date.issued2009en
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Surgery, 2009; 96(2):128-136en
dc.identifier.issn0007-1323en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2168en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/52139-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The aim of this review was to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic procedures for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: Literature databases including Medline, Embase and PubMed were searched up to May 2006 without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies with at least ten patients in each study arm, and case series studies of at least ten patients, were included. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies examining seven endoscopic procedures (Stretta procedure, Bard EndoCinch, Wilson-Cook Endoscopic Suturing Device, NDO Plicator, Enteryx, Gatekeeper Reflux Repair System and Plexiglas) were included in the review. Of the three procedures that were tested against sham controls (Stretta procedure, Bard EndoCinch and Enteryx), patient outcomes in the treatment group were either as good as, or significantly better than, those of control patients in terms of heartburn symptoms, quality of life and medication usage. However, for the two procedures that were tested against laparoscopic fundoplication (Stretta) procedure and Bard EndoCinch), outcomes for patients in the endoscopic group were either as good as, or inferior to, those for the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSION: At present there is insufficient evidence to determine the safety and efficacy of endoscopic procedures for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, particularly in the long term.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityD. Chen, C. Barber, P. McLoughlin, P. Thavaneswaran, G. G. Jamieson and G. J. Maddernen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltden
dc.subjectHumans; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Gastroscopy; Esophagoscopy; Treatment Outcome; Suture Techniques; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topicen
dc.titleSystematic review of endoscopic treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020090174en
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bjs.6440en
dc.identifier.pubid39310-
pubs.library.collectionSurgery publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidMaddern, G. [0000-0003-2064-181X]en
Appears in Collections:Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.