Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/52471
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBinenbaum, E.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationContemporary Economic Policy, 2008; 26(4):636-650-
dc.identifier.issn1074-3529-
dc.identifier.issn1465-7287-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/52471-
dc.descriptionThe definitive version may be found at www.wiley.com-
dc.description.abstract<jats:p><jats:italic>This article sketches how insights from applied game theory can be applied to Research and Development (R&amp;D) consortia using a case study on an international plant breeding consortium. The insights jointly comprise a new “logic of collective action in R&amp;D,” which is inspired by Olson’s Logic of Collective Action but goes beyond it. We analyze R&amp;D consortia as institutions that respond to a variety of incentive problems which are obstacles to realizing the benefits of cooperation that arise due to the public goods nature of outputs, complementarities of inputs, and economies of scale and scope. Additionally, we sketch a “big‐picture” consortium game, which abstracts from specific incentive issues.</jats:italic>(<jats:italic>JEL</jats:italic>B41, D02, H41, O31, O32)</jats:p>-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityEran Binenbaum-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWestern Economic Assoc Int-
dc.source.urihttp://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/120174663/abstract-
dc.titleIncentive issues in R&D consortia: Insights from applied game theory-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00097.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Economics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.