Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/52528
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiaw, S.-
dc.contributor.authorSulaiman, N.-
dc.contributor.authorBarton, C.-
dc.contributor.authorChondros, P.-
dc.contributor.authorHarris, C.-
dc.contributor.authorSawyer, S.-
dc.contributor.authorDharmage, S.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Family Practice, 2008; 9(1):WWW 1-WWW 8-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2296-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2296-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/52528-
dc.description.abstractBackground A cluster randomised trial was conducted to determine the effectiveness of locally adapted practice guidelines and education about paediatric asthma management, delivered to general practitioners (GPs) in small group interactive workshops. Methods Twenty-nine practices were randomly allocated to one of three study arms. Australian asthma management guidelines were adapted to accommodate characteristics of the local area. GPs in the intervention arm (Group 1, n = 18 GPs) participated in a small group based education program and were provided with the adapted guidelines. One control arm (Group 2, n = 18 GPs) received only the adapted guidelines, while the other control arm (Group 3, n = 15 GPs) received an unrelated education intervention. GPs' knowledge, attitudes and management of paediatric asthma was assessed. Results Post intervention, intervention arm GPs were no more likely to provide a written asthma action plan, but were better able to assess the severity of asthma attack (Group 1vs Group 2 p = 0.05 and Group 1 vs Group 3 p = 0.01), better able to identify patients at high risk of severe attack (Group 1vs Group 3 p = 0.06), and tended to score higher on the asthma knowledge questionnaire (Group 1 vs Group 2 p = 0.06 and Group 1 vs Group 3 p = 0.2). Most intervention arm GPs felt more confident than control GPs to manage acute asthma attack and ongoing management of infrequent episodic asthma. Conclusion Using interactive small group workshops to disseminate locally adapted guidelines was associated with improvement in GP's knowledge and confidence to manage asthma, but did not change GP's self-reported provision of written action plans.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySiaw-Teng Liaw, Nabil D Sulaiman, Christopher A Barton, Patty Chondros, Claire A Harris, Susan Sawyer and Shyamali C Dharmage-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.rights© 2008 Liaw et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectAsthma-
dc.subjectCluster Analysis-
dc.subjectLogistic Models-
dc.subjectFamily Practice-
dc.subjectEducation, Medical, Continuing-
dc.subjectClinical Competence-
dc.subjectGuideline Adherence-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topic-
dc.subjectPractice Patterns, Physicians'-
dc.titleAn interactive workshop plus locally adapted guidelines can improve General Practitioners asthma management and knowledge: A cluster randomised trial in the Australian setting-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2296-9-22-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBarton, C. [0000-0001-9823-7425]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_52528.pdfPublished version292.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.