Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/53864
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbellan Van Kan, G.-
dc.contributor.authorRolland, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorBergman, H.-
dc.contributor.authorMorley, J.-
dc.contributor.authorKritchevsky, S.-
dc.contributor.authorVellas, B.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 2008; 12(1):29-37-
dc.identifier.issn1279-7707-
dc.identifier.issn1760-4788-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/53864-
dc.description.abstractFrailty is a commonly used term indicating older persons at increased risk for adverse outcomes such as onset of disability, morbidity, institutionalisation or mortality or who experience a failure to integrate adequate responses in the face of stress. Although most physicians caring for older people recognize the importance of frailty, there is still a lack of both consensus definition and consensual clinical assessment tools. The aim of the present manuscript was to perform a comprehensive review of the definitions and assessment tools on frailty in clinical practice and research, combining evidence derived from a systematic review of literature along with an expert opinion of a European, Canadian and American Geriatric Advisory Panel (GAP). There was no consensus on a definition of frailty but there was agreement to consider frailty as a pre-disability stage. Being disability a consequence rather than the cause of frailty, frail older people do not necessary need to be disabled. The GAP considered that disability (as a consequence of frailty) should not be included in frailty definitions and assessment tools. Although no consensual assessment tool could be proposed, gait speed could represent the most suitable instrument to be implemented both in research and clinical evaluation of older people, as assessment of gait speed at usual pace is a quick, inexpensive and highly reliable measure of frailty.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityG. Abellan Van Kan, Y. Rolland, H. Bergman, J. E. Morley, S. B. Kritchevsky, B. Vellas and On Behalf of the Geriatric Advisory Panel-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSERDI Publisher-
dc.source.urihttp://www.springerlink.com/content/x0037v6446n22472/-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectDisability Evaluation-
dc.subjectGait-
dc.subjectActivities of Daily Living-
dc.subjectGeriatric Assessment-
dc.subjectConsensus-
dc.subjectCognition Disorders-
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over-
dc.subjectFrail Elderly-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectMobility Limitation-
dc.subjectTerminology as Topic-
dc.titleThe I.A.N.A. task force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF02982161-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidMorley, J. [0000-0001-6444-2965]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.