Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/54747
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Barriers and facilitators to evidence based care of type 2 diabetes patients: experience of general practitioners participating to a quality improvement program
Author: Goderis, G.
Borgermans, L.
Mathieu, C.
Van Den Broeke, C.
Hannes, K.
Heyrman, J.
Grol, R.
Citation: Implementation Science, 2009; 4(41):1-11
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Issue Date: 2009
ISSN: 1748-5908
1748-5908
Organisation: The Joanna Briggs Institute
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Geert Goderis, Liesbeth Borgermans, Chantal Mathieu, Carine Van Den Broeke, Karen Hannes, Jan Heyrman and Richard Grol
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the barriers and facilitators to high-quality diabetes care as experienced by general practitioners (GPs) who participated in an 18-month quality improvement program (QIP). This QIP was implemented to promote compliance with international guidelines. Methods Twenty out of the 120 participating GPs in the QIP underwent semi-structured interviews that focused on three questions: 'Which changes did you implement or did you observe in the quality of diabetes care during your participation in the QIP?' 'According to your experience, what induced these changes?' and 'What difficulties did you experience in making the changes?' Results Most GPs reported that enhanced knowledge, improved motivation, and a greater sense of responsibility were the key factors that led to greater compliance with diabetes care guidelines and consequent improvements in diabetes care. Other factors were improved communication with patients and consulting specialists and reliance on diabetes nurse educators. Some GPs were reluctant to collaborate with specialists, and especially with diabetes educators and dieticians. Others blamed poor compliance with the guidelines on lack of time. Most interviewees reported that a considerable minority of patients were unwilling to change their lifestyles. Conclusion Qualitative research nested in an experimental trial may clarify the improvements that a QIP may bring about in a general practice, provide insight into GPs' approach to diabetes care and reveal the program's limits. Implementation of a QIP encounters an array of cognitive, motivational, and relational obstacles that are embedded in a patient-healthcare provider relationship
Rights: © 2009 Goderis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
RMID: 0020093214
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-41
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_54747.pdfPublished version376.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.