Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/54854
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBannister, J.-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationMelbourne University Law Review, 2006; 30(3):961-971-
dc.identifier.issn0025-8938-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/54854-
dc.description.abstractIn the recent McKinnon decision the High Court considered access to Treasury documents under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) where the Minister had issued a ‘conclusive’ certificate that disclosure was contrary to the public interest. The case is fundamentally about who decides what is in the public interest, and whether there is any scope for independent external review of a Minister’s decision.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJudith Bannister-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMelbourne University Law Review-
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2006 Melbourne University Law Review Association, Inc.-
dc.source.urihttp://mulr.law.unimelb.edu.au/go/issues/previous-issues/-2006-volume-30/-2006-volume-30-3-
dc.titleMcKinnon v Secretary, Department of Treasury: the Sir Humphrey clause - review of conclusive certificates in freedom of information applications-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBannister, J. [0000-0002-8089-0853]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Law publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_54854.pdfPublished version181.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.