Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/56906
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDignam, P.-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian Psychiatry, 2009; 17(2):79-81-
dc.identifier.issn1039-8562-
dc.identifier.issn1440-1665-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/56906-
dc.description© 2009 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this paper is to describe some of the differences between personal and administrative approaches to clinical risk management by reflecting on some recent experiences in policy development. Conclusions: Administrative preoccupation with policy development and political accountability may detract from professional development and personal responsibility.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPaul Dignam-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherInforma Healthcare-Taylor & Francis-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10398560802596124-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectRisk Factors-
dc.subjectMental Disorders-
dc.subjectPsychiatry-
dc.subjectMental Health Services-
dc.subjectHealth Policy-
dc.subjectSocial Responsibility-
dc.subjectRisk Management-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.titleAccountability or responsibility? The challenge of policies in clinical psychiatry-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10398560802596124-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Paediatrics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.