Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/56906
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDignam, P.en
dc.date.issued2009en
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian Psychiatry, 2009; 17(2):79-81en
dc.identifier.issn1039-8562en
dc.identifier.issn1440-1665en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/56906-
dc.description© 2009 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatristsen
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this paper is to describe some of the differences between personal and administrative approaches to clinical risk management by reflecting on some recent experiences in policy development. Conclusions: Administrative preoccupation with policy development and political accountability may detract from professional development and personal responsibility.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPaul Dignamen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInforma Healthcare-Taylor & Francisen
dc.subjectHumans; Risk Factors; Mental Disorders; Psychiatry; Mental Health Services; Health Policy; Social Responsibility; Risk Management; Australiaen
dc.titleAccountability or responsibility? The challenge of policies in clinical psychiatryen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020095359en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10398560802596124en
dc.identifier.pubid35799-
pubs.library.collectionPaediatrics publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Paediatrics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.