Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Scalpel safety in the operative setting: A systematic review|
|Citation:||Surgery, 2010; 147(1):98-106|
|Amber M. Watt, Michael Patkin, Michael J. Sinnott, Robert J. Black and Guy J. Maddern|
|Abstract:||<h4>Background</h4>The complex environment of the operative setting provides multiple opportunities for health care workers to sustain scalpel injuries; scalpels are the second most frequent source of sharps injuries in this setting. Little evidence has been published detailing the effectiveness of proposed safety procedures and devices.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic search strategy was used to identify relevant studies. Studies were included based on the application of a predetermined protocol, an independent assessment by 2 reviewers, and a consensus decision. Nineteen articles formed the evidence base for this review.<h4>Results</h4>Little high-level evidence was available. The results of studies reporting on 5 different devices/procedures were identified: the use of cut-resistant gloves/liners decreased the number of glove perforations in comparison with double latex gloves alone but lessened the wearer's dexterity and tactile sensation; the benefit derived from the use of the hands-free passing technique seemed equivocal; "sharpless surgery" was found to be feasible; a single-handed blade remover prevented at least as many injuries as a safety scalpel; and some shoe materials provided superior foot protection.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The lack of available evidence highlights the need for the generation of a methodologically rigorous, clinically relevant, and statistically valid body of primary research in this area to support appropriate and effective safety interventions.|
|Keywords:||Humans; Protective Devices; Surgical Instruments; Accidents, Occupational; Operating Rooms|
|Rights:||© 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.|
|Appears in Collections:||Surgery publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.