Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/60066
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAinsworth, Richard Bruceen
dc.contributor.advisorPayenberg, Tobias Hans Diederichen
dc.contributor.advisorLang, Simon Christopheren
dc.contributor.advisorKassan, Jochenen
dc.contributor.authorRiordan, Sarah J.en
dc.date.issued2009en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/60066-
dc.description.abstractDespite increasing computer power, the requirement to upscale 3D geological models for dynamic reservoir simulation purposes is likely to remain in many commercial environments. This study established that there is a relationship between sandbody size, cell size and changes to predictions of reservoir production as grids are upscaled. The concept of a cell width to sandbody width ratio (CSWR) was developed to allow the comparison of changes in reservoir performance as grids are upscaled. A case study of the Flounder Field in the Gippsland Basin resulted in the interpretation of three depositional environments in the intra-Latrobe reservoir interval. The sandbody dimensions associated with these depositional environments were used to build a series of 3D geological models. These were upscaled vertically and horizontally to numerous grid cell sizes. Results from over 1400 dynamic models indicate that if the CSWR is kept below 0.3 there will be a strong correlation between the average production from the upscaled grids compared to those of a much finer grid, and there will be less than 10% variation in average total field production. If the CSWR is between 0.3 and 1, there could be up to 30% difference, and once the CSWR exceeds 1.0 there is only a weak relationship between the results from upscaled grids and those of finer grids. As grids are upscaled the morphology of bodies in facies models changes, the distribution of petrophysical properties is attenuated and the structure is smoothed. All these factors result in a simplification of the fluid flow pathways through a model. Significant loss of morphology occurs when cells are upscaled to more than a half the width of the reservoir body being modelled. A simple rule of thumb is established — if the geological features of a model cannot be recognised when looking at a layer in the upscaled grid, the properties of the upscaled grid are unlikely to be similar to those of the original grid and the predictions of dynamic models may vary significantly from those of a finer grid. This understanding of the influence of sandbody size on the behaviour of upscaled dynamic models can be used in the planning stages of a reservoir modelling project. Two simple charts have been created. The first chart is for calculating the approximate number of cells in a model before it is built. The second chart is for comparing the proposed cell size against the CWSR, so that the predicted discrepancy between the ultimate production from the upscaled grid and one with much smaller cells can be assessed. These two charts enhance discussion between all interested disciplines regarding the potential dimensions of both static and upscaled dynamic models during the planning stage of a modelling project, and how that may influence the results of dynamic modelling.en
dc.subjectFlounder Field; Gippsland Basin; facies model; 3D reservoir characterisation upscaling; grid cell sizeen
dc.subject.lcshGeological modeling.en
dc.titleManaging the interdisciplinary requirements of 3D geological models.en
dc.typeThesisen
dc.contributor.schoolAustralian School of Petroleumen
dc.provenanceCopyright material removed from digital thesis. See print copy in University of Adelaide Library for full text.en
dc.description.dissertationThesis (Ph.D.) - University of Adelaide, Australian School of Petroleum, 2009en
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdfFront matter639.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02chapter1.pdfChapter 1819.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03chapter2.pdfChapter 24.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
04chapters3-4.pdfChapters 3-43.77 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
05chapter5PartA.pdfChapter 5 part A2.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
06chapter5PartB.pdfChapter 5 part B3.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
07chapter6PartA.pdfChapter 6 part A3.9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
08chapter6PartB.pdfChapter 6 part B4.33 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
09chapters7-9.pdfChapters 7-91.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
10append1.pdfAppendix 11.33 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
11append2.pdfAppendix 23.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
12append3-5.pdfAppendices 3-51.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.