Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/60327
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, S.-
dc.contributor.authorMerlin, T.-
dc.contributor.authorKreisz, F.-
dc.contributor.authorCraft, P.-
dc.contributor.authorHiller, J.-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2009; 33(5):430-436-
dc.identifier.issn1326-0200-
dc.identifier.issn1753-6405-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/60327-
dc.description.abstractObjective: A systematic review assessed the relative safety and effectiveness of digital mammography compared with film-screen mammography. This study utilised the evidence from the review to examine the economic value of digital compared with film-screen mammography in Australia. Methods: A cost-comparison analysis between the two technologies was conducted for the overall population for the purposes of breast cancer screening and diagnosis. In addition, a cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for the screening subgroups where digital mammography was considered to be more accurate than film-screen mammography. Results: Digital mammography in a screening setting is $11 more per examination than film-screen mammography, and $36 or $33 more per examination in a diagnostic setting when either digital radiography or computed radiography is used. In both the screening and diagnostic settings, the throughput of the mammography system had the most significant impact on decreasing the incremental cost/examination/year of digital mammography. Conclusion: Digital mammography is more expensive than film-screen mammography. Whether digital mammography represents good value for money depends on the eventual life-years and quality-adjusted life-years gained from the early cancer diagnosis. Implications: The evidence generated from this study has informed the allocation of public resources for the screening and diagnosis of breast cancer in Australia.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityShuhong Wang, Tracy Merlin, Florian Kreisz, Paul Craft and Janet E. Hiller-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPublic Health Assoc Australia Inc-
dc.rights© 2009 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2009 Public Health Association of Australia-
dc.subjectCost-
dc.subjecteffectiveness-
dc.subjectdigital mammography-
dc.subjectfilm-screen mammography-
dc.subjectscreening-
dc.subjectbreast cancer-
dc.titleCost and cost-effectiveness of digital mammography compared with film-screen mammography in Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00424.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidWang, S. [0000-0002-9793-5851]-
dc.identifier.orcidMerlin, T. [0000-0002-7293-4262]-
dc.identifier.orcidHiller, J. [0000-0002-8532-4033]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.