Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Lessons from the Australian Patient Safety Foundation: setting up a national patient safety surveillance system - is this the right model?|
|Citation:||BMJ Quality and Safety, 2002; 11(3):246-251|
|Publisher:||British Med Journal Publ Group|
|Abstract:||The evolution of the concepts and processes underpinning the Australian Patient Safety Foundation's systems over the last 15 years are traced. An ideal system should have the following attributes: an independent organisation to coordinate patient safety surveillance; agreed frameworks for patient safety and surveillance systems; common, agreed standards and terminology; a single, clinically useful classification for things that go wrong in health care; a national repository for information covering all of health care from all available sources; mechanisms for setting priorities at local, national and international levels; a just system which caters for the rights of patients, society, and healthcare practitioners and facilities; separate processes for accountability and "systems learnings"; the right to anonymity and legal privilege for reporters; systems for rapid feedback and evidence of action; mechanisms for involving and informing all stakeholders. There are powerful reasons for establishing national systems, for aligning terminology, tools and classification systems internationally, and for rapid dissemination of successful strategies.|
Delivery of Health Care
|Description:||COPYRIGHT 2002 British Medical Association|
|Appears in Collections:||Anaesthesia and Intensive Care publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.