Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Setting priorities for patient safety
Author: Runciman, W.
Edmonds, M.
Pradhan, M.
Citation: BMJ Quality and Safety, 2002; 11(3):224-229
Publisher: British Med Journal Publ Group
Issue Date: 2002
ISSN: 1475-3898
Statement of
W B Runciman, M J Edmonds and M Pradhan
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Current "flags" for adverse events (AEs) are biased towards those with serious outcomes, potentially leading to failure to address mundane common problems. AIM: To provide a basis for setting priorities to improve patient safety by ranking adverse events by resource consumption as well as by outcome. This was done by classifying a set of AEs, according to how they may be prevented, into “Principal Natural Categories” (PNCs). Setting: AEs associated with a representative sample of admissions to Australian acute care hospitals. DESIGN: AEs were classified into PNCs which were ranked by overall frequency, an index of resource consumption (a function of mean extended hospital stay and the number of cases in each PNC), and severity of outcome. RESULTS: The 1712 AEs analysed fell into 581 PNCs; only 28% had more than two cases. Most resource use (60%) was by AEs which led to minor disabilities, 36% was by those which led to major disabilities, and 4% by those associated with death. Most of the events with serious outcomes fell into fewer than 50 PNCs; only seven of these PNCs had more than six cases resulting in serious outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: If interventions for AEs are triggered only by serious outcomes by, for example, using recommended risk scoring methods, most problems would not be addressed, particularly the large number of mundane problems which consume the majority of resources. Both serious and mundane problems should be addressed. Most types of events occur too infrequently to be characterised at a hospital level and require large scale (preferably national) collections of incidents and events.
Keywords: Humans
Iatrogenic Disease
Hospital Mortality
Risk Assessment
Hospital Administration
Safety Management
Health Care Rationing
Medical Errors
Health Priorities
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Description: Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.224
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Anaesthesia and Intensive Care publications
Aurora harvest 5

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_6038.pdf181.52 kBPublisher's PDF View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.