Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIrving, M.-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, D.-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, S.-
dc.contributor.authorWalker, R.-
dc.contributor.authorFrommer, M.-
dc.contributor.authorFetherstonhaugh, D.-
dc.contributor.authorDeans, P.-
dc.contributor.authorCraig, J.-
dc.identifier.citationNephrology, 2010; 15(1):48-53-
dc.description.abstractAIM: Renal nurses in Australia and New Zealand are critical to the care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially those on dialysis. We aimed to obtain the opinions of renal nurses in Australia and New Zealand on the Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment (CARI) Guidelines. METHODS: A self-administered survey was distributed to all members of the professional organisation for renal nurses (Renal Society of Australasia) in 2006. The results were compared with those from a similar survey in 2002 and an identical 2006 survey of Australian and New Zealand nephrologists. RESULTS: Of the 173 respondents, more than 95% considered the Guidelines to be a good synthesis of the available evidence, 80% indicated that the Guidelines had significantly influenced their practice and 86% considered that the Guidelines had improved patient outcomes. Older respondents were less likely to perceive that the Guidelines had improved patient outcomes, and renal nurse educators were more likely to consider that the Guidelines were based on the best available evidence than other respondents. Respondents were generally more positive about the Guidelines in 2006 than in 2002. Although nephrologists were generally positive about the CARI Guidelines, renal nurses were more positive, especially regarding the effect of the Guidelines on practice and the improvement in health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Australian and New Zealand renal nurses valued the CARI Guidelines highly, used them in practice and considered that they led to improved patient outcomes. Positive responses towards the Guidelines increased between 2002 and 2006.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMichelle J. Irving, David W. Johnson, Stephen McDonald, Rowan G. Walker, Michael S. Frommer, Dierdre Fetherstonhaugh, Pamela Deans and Jonathan C. Craig-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Asia-
dc.rights© 2010 The Authors-
dc.subjectKidney Diseases-
dc.subjectChronic Disease-
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnel-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectNew Zealand-
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topic-
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires-
dc.titleOpinions on the content and effects of the Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment (CARI) Guidelines: A survey of renal nurses and comparison with the opinions of nephrologists in Australasia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.orcidMcDonald, S. [0000-0001-6103-1386]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.