Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/6176
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Labelling of acute respiratory illness: evidence of between-practitioner variation in the UK
Author: Stocks, N.
Fahey, T.
Citation: Family Practice, 2002; 19(4):375-377
Publisher: Oxford Univ Press
Issue Date: 2002
ISSN: 0263-2136
1460-2229
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Nigel Stocks and Tom Fahey
Abstract: Background. It is unclear which symptoms and signs GPs use when attributing diagnostic labels to patients with acute respiratory illness (ARI). Objective. We sought to ascertain GPs' self-reported definitions of ARI. Methods. A postal questionnaire concerned with the diagnosis of ARI was sent to all registered GPs in Avon Health Authority. GPs were asked to choose a clinical term that would describe the clinical presentation in four hypothetical patients, and the next three questions asked them to define acute bronchitis, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and any other term they used for ARI (excluding pneumonia). We measured proportions and compared responses across the three diagnostic categories. Results. The majority (88%) of GPs agreed that cough associated with fever should be labelled as a URTI. When sputum and chest signs were also present, opinion was more divided, with 62% diagnosing acute bronchitis in young patients and 72% lower respiratory tract infection in old patients. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that there is more consistent use of diagnostic labels for URTI than for acute bronchitis or other terms used to label ARI. In the future, researchers should quantify the prognostic significance of symptoms and signs in ARI and provide GPs with a more rational approach to the diagnosis and management of ARI. Keywords. Acute respiratory illness, GPs, labelling, variation.
Keywords: Humans; Respiratory Tract Infections; Bronchitis; Acute Disease; Family Practice; Adult; Terminology as Topic; United Kingdom
Description: © Oxford University Press 2002
RMID: 0020020558
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/19.4.375
Appears in Collections:General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.