Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/62054
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Contesting the 'national interest' and maintaining 'our lifestyle': A discursive analysis of political rhetoric around climate change
Author: Kurz, T.
Augoustinos, M.
Crabb, S.
Citation: British Journal of Social Psychology, 2010; 49(3):601-625
Publisher: British Psychological Soc
Issue Date: 2010
ISSN: 0144-6665
2044-8309
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Tim Kurz, Martha Augoustinos and Shona Crabb
Abstract: The release of the fourth United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report in February 2007 prompted a flood of responses from political leaders around the globe. Perhaps nowhere was this more apparent than in Australia, where its release coincided with the first sitting week of the Australian Parliament, in an election year. The current study involves a discursive analysis of climate change rhetoric produced by politicians from the major Australian political parties in the period following the release of the IPCC leading up to the national election. Data include both transcripts of parliamentary debate and statements directly broadcast in the media. The analysis focuses on the various ways in which the issue of climate change was invoked and rhetorically managed by each of the two parties in the lead up to the election. In particular, it focuses on the ways in which appeals to the 'national interest' and 'lifestyle maintenance', both regular features of political rhetoric, were mobilized by both parties to discursively manage their positions on the climate change issue. Implications of the ways in which such appeals were constructed are discussed in relation to the discursive limits of the ways in which the issue of climate change is constructed in public debate.
Keywords: Humans; Communication; Propaganda; Deception; Life Style; Social Values; Politics; Public Opinion; United Nations; Australia; Climate Change; Denial, Psychological
Rights: Copyright © The British Psychological SocietyReproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
RMID: 0020101035
DOI: 10.1348/014466609X481173
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.