Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/62186
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, I.-
dc.contributor.authorPisaniello, D.-
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, J.-
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, S.-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 2010; 31(9):918-925-
dc.identifier.issn0899-823X-
dc.identifier.issn1559-6834-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/62186-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To present the evaluation of a large-scale quantitative respirator-fit testing program. DESIGN: Concurrent questionnaire survey of fit testers and test subjects. SETTING: Ambulatory care, home nursing care, and acute care hospitals across South Australia. METHODS: Quantitative facial-fit testing was performed with TSI PortaCount instruments for healthcare workers (HCWs) who wore 5 different models of a disposable P2 (N95-equivalent) respirator. The questionnaire included questions about the HCW's age, sex, race, occupational category, main area of work, smoking status, facial characteristics, prior training and experience in use of respiratory masks, and number of attempts to obtain a respirator fit. RESULTS: A total of 6,160 HCWs were successfully fitted during the period from January through July 2007. Of the 4,472 HCWs who responded to the questionnaire and were successfully fitted, 3,707 (82.9%) were successfully fitted with the first tested respirator, 551 (12.3%) required testing with a second model, and 214 (4.8%) required 3 or more tests. We noted an increased pass rate on the first attempt over time. Asians (excluding those from South and Central Asia) had the highest failure rate (16.3% [45 of 276 Asian HCWs were unsuccessfully fitted]), and whites had the lowest (9.8% [426 of 4,338 white HCWs]). Race was highly correlated with facial shape. Among occupational groups, doctors had the highest failure rate (13.4% [81 of 604 doctors]), but they also had the highest proportion of Asians. Prior education and/or training in respirator use were not associated with a higher pass rate. CONCLUSIONS: Certain facial characteristics were associated with higher or lower pass rates with regard to fit testing, and fit testers were able to select a suitable respirator on the basis of a visual assessment in the majority of cases. For the fit tester, training and experience were important factors; however, for the HCW being fitted, prior experience in respirator use was not an important factor.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityI.J. Wilkinson, D. Pisaniello, J. Ahmad, S. Edwards-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSlack Inc-
dc.rights© 2010 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086/655460-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectEquipment Design-
dc.subjectEquipment Failure Analysis-
dc.subjectRespiratory Protective Devices-
dc.subjectInhalation Exposure-
dc.subjectOccupational Exposure-
dc.subjectInfection Control-
dc.subjectInservice Training-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectHealth Personnel-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires-
dc.titleEvaluation of a large-scale quantitative respirator-fit testing program for healthcare workers: Survey results-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/655460-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidPisaniello, D. [0000-0002-4156-0608]-
dc.identifier.orcidEdwards, S. [0000-0003-2074-1685]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.