Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Trade facilitation and the measurement of trade costs|
|Citation:||Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 2010; 1(1):145-163|
|Publisher:||World Scientific Publishing|
|Richard Pomfret and Patricia Sourdin|
|Abstract:||As tariffs and non-tariff barriers (NTBs) fall attention has shifted to trade facilitation, both in the WTO and in regional arrangements such as ASEAN or APEC. Economists have, however, been slow to develop convincing measures of trade costs. Commonly cited estimates of the border effect or of trade costs are huge, but flawed. The gap between CIF and FOB values of trade is the best aggregate measure, but suffers from lack of consistent data. This paper reviews evidence in the literature based on US and Australian import data, extends the sample to include data from Chile and Brazil and concludes that inferences about trade costs are fairly robust across various countries' import datasets.|
|Keywords:||Gravity models; trade costs; trade facilitation|
|Rights:||Copyright status unknown|
|Appears in Collections:||Economics publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.