Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Citation:||Ethical Questions and International NGOs: an exchange between philosophers and NGOs, 2010 / Horton, K. (ed./s), pp.157-174|
|Series/Report no.:||Library of ethics and applied philosophy ; v. 23.|
|Abstract:||The circumstances that create the need for humanitarian action are rarely morally neutral. The extremes of deprivation and want that demand a humanitarian response are often themselves directly caused by acts of war, persecution or misgovernment. And even when the direct causes lie elsewhere—when suffering and loss are caused by natural disaster, endemic disease or poverty of natural resources—the explanations of why some people are afflicted, and not others, are not morally neutral. It is those without economic or political power who starve in famines, those who inhabit the most marginal areas who are killed by floods and landslides, those without access to basic education and health care who die from easily preventable diseases. The societies in which these things can happen are unjust, and the injustice of disempowerment is both itself one of the universal afflictions of poverty and a condition of its many other vulnerabilities.|
|Rights:||© Springer, Part of Springer Science+Business Media|
|Appears in Collections:||Philosophy publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.