Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Type: Conference paper
Title: Adult language learners under cognitive load do not over-regularize like children
Author: Perfors, A.
Burns, N.
Citation: Cognition in flux: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 11-14, August, 2010 / S. Ohlsson and R. Catrambone (eds.); pp.2524-2529
Publisher: Cognitive Science Society
Publisher Place: www
Issue Date: 2010
Conference Name: Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (32nd : 2010 : Portland, Oregon)
Statement of
Amy Perfors and Nicholas Burns
Abstract: The "less is more" hypothesis suggests that one reason adults and children differ in their language acquisition abilities is that they also differ in other cognitive capacities: for instance, the relatively poor memory and/or processing abilities of children may make them more likely to over-regularize inconsistent input (Singleton & Newport, 2004; Hudson Kam & Newport, 2005). We investigate this hypothesis by placing adults under a high cognitive load using a standard task. Does their tendency to over-regularize in a simultaneous language-learning task increase? Results indicate that although the cognitive load is high enough to impair overall learning, neither the presence of load nor poor working memory predicts greater overregularization. This suggests that if the "less is more" hypothesis explains over-regularization in children, the relevant cognitive capacity is not one that was impaired by our load task.
Rights: © Authors
RMID: 0020104197
Description (link):
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_64268.pdfPublished version94.57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.