Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/66968
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Determining the energy expenditure during some household and garden tasks
Author: Gunn, S.
Brooks, A.
Withers, R.
Gore, C.
Owen, N.
Booth, M.
Bauman, A.
Citation: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2002; 34(5):895-902
Publisher: American College of Sports Medicine
Issue Date: 2002
ISSN: 0195-9131
1530-0315
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Simon M. Gunn, Anthony G. Brooks, Robert T. Withers, Christopher J. Gore, Neville Owen, Michael L. Booth, and Adrian E. Bauman
Abstract: Purpose: This study: a) calculated the reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) and precision (technical error of measurement, TEM) for [latin capital V with dot above]O2 during moderate paced walking, self-paced sweeping, window cleaning, vacuuming and lawn mowing; b) determined which of the five activities rated >= 3.0 when exercise intensity was calculated in METs (1 MET or metabolic equivalent = [latin capital V with dot above]O2 of 3.5 mL kg-1 min-1) and multiples of the measured resting metabolic rate (RMR); and c) expanded the limited database on energy expenditure during household and garden activities. Methods: Twelve men and 12 women (mean ± SD: 39.3 ± 3.4 yr; 171.6 ± 9.6 cm; 81.0 ± 15.5 kg) were measured for RMR and [latin capital V with dot above]O2 during the five activities on two separate days via indirect calorimetry by using the Douglas bag method. Results: The interday ICCs and TEMs for the five activities ranged from 0.81 to 0.97 and from 2.1 to 7.0%, respectively. The means were significantly (P < 0.001) above 3.0 for moderate paced walking (range = 3.3–8.7), sweeping (2.9–6.7), window cleaning (3.0–6.0), vacuuming (2.6–4.4), and lawn mowing (4.9–7.5) when [latin capital V with dot above]O2 was divided by measured RMR, but one and five subjects scored below 3.0 for sweeping and vacuuming, respectively. Division of exercise [latin capital V with dot above]O2 by the convention of 3.5 mL O2 kg-1 min-1 significantly decreased (P < 0.001) each mean, and lawn mowing (5.0 METs) was the only activity where all subjects scored above 3.0 METs (P < 0.001; 3.8–6.4); nevertheless, the means for walking (3.7 METs), sweeping (3.2 METs), and window cleaning (3.6 METs) were also in the moderate intensity category of 3–6 METs. Conclusions: These data: a) emphasize that the [latin capital V with dot above]O2 during self-paced moderate intensity walking and self-paced household and garden activities can be measured with reproducibility and precision, b) demonstrate that expressing energy expenditure in conventional METs yields lower values than when it is presented as a multiple of measured RMR, c) suggest that all activities except vacuuming are performed at moderate intensity when energy expenditure is expressed in conventional METs, and d) highlight the biological variability in energy expenditure when different people perform the same task.
Keywords: RMR; MET; sweeping; lawn mowing; window cleaning; vacuuming
Rights: ©2002The American College of Sports Medicine
RMID: 0030001000
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200205000-00026
Description (link): http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Abstract/2002/05000/Determining_energy_expenditure_during_some.26.aspx
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.