Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/67416
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGibson, L.en
dc.contributor.authorLee, T.en
dc.contributor.authorKoh, L.en
dc.contributor.authorBrook, B.en
dc.contributor.authorGardner, T.en
dc.contributor.authorBarlow, J.en
dc.contributor.authorPeres, C.en
dc.contributor.authorBradshaw, C.en
dc.contributor.authorLaurance, W.en
dc.contributor.authorLovejoy, T.en
dc.contributor.authorSodhi, N.en
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.citationNature, 2011; 478(7369):378-381en
dc.identifier.issn0028-0836en
dc.identifier.issn1476-4687en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/67416-
dc.description.abstractHuman-driven land-use changes increasingly threaten biodiversity, particularly in tropical forests where both species diversity and human pressures on natural environments are high. The rapid conversion of tropical forests for agriculture, timber production and other uses has generated vast, human-dominated landscapes with potentially dire consequences for tropical biodiversity. Today, few truly undisturbed tropical forests exist, whereas those degraded by repeated logging and fires, as well as secondary and plantation forests, are rapidly expanding. Here we provide a global assessment of the impact of disturbance and land conversion on biodiversity in tropical forests using a meta-analysis of 138 studies. We analysed 2,220 pairwise comparisons of biodiversity values in primary forests (with little or no human disturbance) and disturbed forests. We found that biodiversity values were substantially lower in degraded forests, but that this varied considerably by geographic region, taxonomic group, ecological metric and disturbance type. Even after partly accounting for confounding colonization and succession effects due to the composition of surrounding habitats, isolation and time since disturbance, we find that most forms of forest degradation have an overwhelmingly detrimental effect on tropical biodiversity. Our results clearly indicate that when it comes to maintaining tropical biodiversity, there is no substitute for primary forests.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLuke Gibson, Tien Ming Lee, Lian Pin Koh, Barry W. Brook, Toby A. Gardner, Jos Barlow, Carlos A. Peres, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, William F. Laurance, Thomas E. Lovejoy and Navjot S. Sodhien
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen
dc.rights©2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserveden
dc.subjectAnimals; Humans; Trees; Conservation of Natural Resources; Biodiversity; Tropical Climateen
dc.titlePrimary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020113830en
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/nature10425en
dc.identifier.pubid27226-
pubs.library.collectionEarth and Environmental Sciences publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidBradshaw, C. [0000-0002-5328-7741]en
Appears in Collections:Earth and Environmental Sciences publications
Environment Institute Leaders publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.