Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Resuscitation orders and their relevance to patients' clinical status and outcomes|
|Citation:||QJM-monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians, 2011; 104(6):485-488|
|Publisher:||Oxford Univ Press|
|N. Shanmuganathan, J.Y. Li, T.Y. Yong, P.H. Hakendorf, D.I. Ben-Tovim, and C.H. Thompson|
|Abstract:||Background: Documented resuscitation orders have relevance in the management of a pulseless, unresponsive patient. Although useful, the frequency of their documentation in the case notes of newly admitted medical patients is not well established. Aim: To investigate the frequency of early clear documentation of resuscitation orders in patients’ admission notes. Design: Retrospective audit. Methods: The admission notes of 618 medical admissions to an Australian tertiary referral teaching hospital between January and December 2007 were reviewed to calculate the frequency of clear resuscitation documentation. Certain outcomes of each admission, such as in-hospital death, were obtained via hospital-based computerized records. Results: Within the first 24 h of admission, discussions regarding resuscitation were not documented for 78% of patients. Of the 482 patients with no documented resuscitation orders, 5 patients died during their index admission. Of the 136 patients with documented resuscitation orders, 24 patients died during their index admission. As age or a measure of clinical debility increased, the absolute number and relative proportion of resuscitation discussions increased significantly (P < 0.0001) and the number and proportion of patients deemed not for resuscitation also increased (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Those patients apparently targeted for discussion were older, more frail and acutely unwell. We propose widespread use of a clinical scoring system to identify those patients who need their resuscitation status clarified early in their admission prior to clinical deterioration.|
|Keywords:||Humans; Resuscitation Orders; Patient Admission; Medical Records; Hospital Mortality; Retrospective Studies; Age Factors; Aged, 80 and over; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care); Female; Male; Clinical Audit|
|Rights:||© The Author 2010.|
|Appears in Collections:||Medicine publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.