Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Assessing clinical trials of internet addiction treatment: a systematic review and CONSORT evaluation|
|Citation:||Clinical Psychology Review, 2011; 31(7):1110-1116|
|Publisher:||Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd|
|Daniel L. King, Paul H. Delfabbro, Mark D. Griffiths, Michael Gradisar|
|Abstract:||Although there is ongoing debate concerning the clinical status of Internet addiction, and the quality of the extant literature in this emerging field is not optimal, several clinical trials of both pharmacological and psychological treatments for Internet addiction have been published in recent years. A systematic review investigating the reporting quality of eight treatment studies is presented. Reporting quality was defined according to the 2010 Consolidating Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. An evaluation of the reviewed studies highlighted several key limitations, including (a) inconsistencies in the definition and diagnosis of Internet addiction, (b) a lack of randomization and blinding techniques, (c) a lack of adequate controls or other comparison groups, and (d) insufficient information concerning recruitment dates, sample characteristics, and treatment effect sizes. It is concluded that improvements in future studies' design and reporting would be of significant benefit to both researchers and clinicians, and to the overall positioning of Internet addiction in the behavioral addiction field.|
|Keywords:||Internet; Online; Addiction; Treatment; Intervention; CONSORT|
|Rights:||Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.