Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/69670
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeask, J.-
dc.contributor.authorBraunack-Mayer, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKerridge, I.-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2011; 47(9):603-607-
dc.identifier.issn1034-4810-
dc.identifier.issn1440-1754-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/69670-
dc.description.abstractChildhood immunisation programmes have seen well-heralded successes in disease control. An increasing number of scheduled vaccines, narrowing risk–benefit ratios and public attention to vaccine safety raise new questions about consent. We first explore the challenges that this highly dynamic environment poses for valid consent. Then, we broaden this discussion to wider public engagement by suggesting how the public – the bearers of vaccine risk and benefit – can be better involved in immunisation policy.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJulie Leask, Annette Braunack-Mayer and Ian Kerridge-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Asia-
dc.rights© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health © 2011 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians)-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02160.x-
dc.subjectethics-
dc.subjectimmunisation-
dc.subjectinfectious diseases-
dc.subjectshared decision-making-
dc.titleConsent and public engagement in an era of expanded childhood immunisation-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02160.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBraunack-Mayer, A. [0000-0003-4427-0224]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.