Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/70144
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The doctor and the patient - How is a clinical encounter perceived?
Author: Adams, R.
Price, K.
Tucker, G.
Nguyen, A.
Wilson, D.
Citation: Patient Education and Counseling, 2012; 86(1):127-133
Publisher: Elsevier Sci Ireland Ltd
Issue Date: 2012
ISSN: 0738-3991
1873-5134
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Robert Adams, Kay Price, Graeme Tucker, Anh-Minh Nguyen, David Wilson
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the population distribution of different types of relationships between people with chronic conditions and their doctors that influence decisions being made from a shared-decision making perspective. METHODS: A survey questionnaire based on recurring themes about the doctor/patient relationship identified from qualitative in-depth interviews with people with chronic conditions and doctors was administered to a national population sample (n=999) of people with chronic conditions. RESULTS: Three factors explained the doctor/patient relationship. Factor 1 identified a positive partnership characteristic of involvement and shared decision-making; Factor 2 doctor-controlled relationship; Factor 3 relationship with negative dimensions. Cluster analysis identified four population groups. Cluster 1 doctor is in control (9.7% of the population); Cluster 2 ambivalent (27.6%); Cluster 3 positive long-term relationship (58.6%); Cluster 4 unhappy relationship (4.4%). The proportion of 18-34 year olds is significantly higher than expected in Cluster 4. The proportion of 65+ year olds is significantly higher than expected in Cluster 1, and significantly lower than expected in Cluster 4. CONCLUSION: This study adds to shared decision-making literature in that it shows in a representative sample of people with chronic illnesses how their perceptions of their experiences of the doctor-patient relationship are distributed across the population. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Consideration needs to be given as to whether it is better to help doctors to alter their styles of interactions to suit the preferences of different patients or if it is feasible to match patients with doctors by style of decision-making and patient preference.
Keywords: Social space; Patient-centered care; Qualitative research; Population surveys; Doctor–patient relationship
Rights: Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
RMID: 0020116263
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.002
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.