Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Bullying allegations from the accused bully's perspective|
|Citation:||British Journal of Management, 2012; 23(4):489-501|
|Publisher:||Blackwell Publ Ltd|
|Moira F. Jenkins, Dieter Zapf, Helen Winefield and Aspa Sarris|
|Abstract:||Research on workplace bullying to date has relied predominantly on self-reports from targets and bystanders, largely ignoring the contributions of other stakeholders such as the alleged perpetrator. This study aims to close this gap by focusing on the perspectives of the alleged perpetrator and examining the background of the bullying allegations, the types of behaviours labelled as bullying and the perpetrator's justification of their behaviours. Twenty-four managers who were accused of workplace bullying were interviewed for this study, and a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was undertaken. Many participants reported a highly stressful workplace, including ambiguous roles, staff shortages and high levels of conflict, as well as inappropriate social behaviours being carried out by others in addition to themselves. A number of participants viewed themselves as targets of bullying by their staff, and others defended their behaviour as legitimate performance management.|
|Rights:||© 2011 The Author(s). British Journal of Management © 2011 British Academy of Management|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.