Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/71359
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHannes, K.-
dc.contributor.authorPearson, A.-
dc.contributor.editorHannes, K.-
dc.contributor.editorLockwood, C.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationSynthesizing Qualitative Research: Choosing the Right Approach, 2012 / Hannes, K., Lockwood, C. (ed./s), pp.21-37-
dc.identifier.isbn9780470656389-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/71359-
dc.description.abstractMeta-aggregation seeks to generate summaries to determine the value of the findings of individual studies in terms of their practical consequences. The example on barriers towards the implementation of evidence-based practice guides researchers through the main steps of the aggregative approach: the development of a question, the search for evidence, the critical appraisal of original research papers and the aggregation of original findings into categories, and further on into syntheses. We also present the Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument as an online tool that can support authors in conducting their synthesis. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityKarin Hanens and Alan Pearson-
dc.description.urihttp://trove.nla.gov.au/work/154347873-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119959847.ch2-
dc.titleObstacles to the implementation of evidence-based practice in Belgium: a worked example of meta-aggregation-
dc.typeBook chapter-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/9781119959847.ch2-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.