Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/72118
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSweatman, H.en
dc.contributor.authorDelean, J.en
dc.contributor.authorSyms, C.en
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.citationCoral Reefs, 2011; 30(2):521-531en
dc.identifier.issn0722-4028en
dc.identifier.issn1432-0975en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/72118-
dc.description.abstractWhile coral reefs in many parts of the world are in decline as a direct consequence of human pressures, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is unusual in that direct human pressures are low and the entire system of ~2,900 reefs has been managed as a marine park since the 1980s. In spite of these advantages, standard annual surveys of a large number of reefs showed that from 1986 to 2004, average live coral cover across the GBR declined from 28 to 22%. This overall decline was mainly due to large losses in six (21%) of 29 subregions. Declines in live coral cover on reefs in two inshore subregions coincided with thermal bleaching in 1998, while declines in four midself subregions were due to outbreaks of predatory starfish. Otherwise, living coral cover increased in one subregion (3%) and 22 subregions (76%) showed no substantial change. Reefs in the great majority of subregions showed cycles of decline and recovery over the survey period, but with little synchrony among subregions. Two previous studies examined long-term changes in live coral cover on GBR reefs using meta-analyses including historical data from before the mid-1980s. Both found greater rates of loss of coral and recorded a marked decrease in living coral cover on the GBR in 1986, coinciding exactly with the start of large-scale monitoring. We argue that much of the apparent long-term decrease results from combining data from selective, sparse, small-scale studies before 1986 with data from both small-scale studies and large-scale monitoring surveys after that date. The GBR has clearly been changed by human activities and live coral cover has declined overall, but losses of coral in the past 40–50 years have probably been overestimated.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityH. Sweatman, S. Delean and C. Symsen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.rights© Springer-Verlag 2011en
dc.subjectCoral cover; Great Barrier reef; Llong-termmonitoring; acanthaster; disturbance and recoveryen
dc.titleAssessing loss of coral cover on Australia's Great Barrier Reef over two decades, with implications for longer-term trendsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020110793en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00338-010-0715-1en
dc.identifier.pubid28687-
pubs.library.collectionEarth and Environmental Sciences publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Earth and Environmental Sciences publications
Environment Institute publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.