University of Adelaide Library

Adelaide Research and Scholarship : Schools and Disciplines : School of Paediatrics & Reproductive Health : Obstetrics and Gynaecology : Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/73268

Times cited in Scopus
Times cited in Web of Science®
Type: Journal article
Title: A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the motor system: An international consensus study
Author: Chipchase, L.
Schabrun, S.
Cohen, L.
Hodges, P.
Ridding, M.
Rothwell, J.
Taylor, J.
Ziemann, U.
Citation: Clinical Neurophysiology, 2012; 123(9):1698-1704
Publisher: Elsevier Sci Ireland Ltd
Issue Date: 2012
ISSN: 1388-2457
1872-8952
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Lucy Chipchase, Siobhan Schabrun, Leonardo Cohen, Paul Hodges, Michael Ridding, John Rothwell, Janet Taylor, Ulf Ziemann
Abstract: In the last decade transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been the subject of more than 20,000 original research articles. Despite this popularity, TMS responses are known to be highly variable and this variability can impact on interpretation of research findings. There are no guidelines regarding the factors that should be reported and/or controlled in TMS studies. This study aimed to develop a checklist to be recommended to evaluate the methodology and reporting of studies that use single or paired pulse TMS to study the motor system. A two round international web-based Delphi study was conducted. Panellists rated the importance of a number of subject, methodological and analytical factors to be reported and/or controlled in studies that use single or paired pulse TMS to study the motor system. Twenty-seven items for single pulse studies and 30 items for paired pulse studies were included in the final checklist. Eight items related to subjects (e.g. age, gender), 21 to methodology (e.g. coil type, stimulus intensity) and two to analysis (e.g. size of the unconditioned motor evoked potential). The checklist is recommended for inclusion when submitting manuscripts for publication to ensure transparency of reporting and could also be used to critically appraise previously published work. It is envisaged that factors could be added and deleted from the checklist on the basis of future research. Use of the TMS methodological checklist should improve the quality of data collection and reporting in TMS studies of the motor system.
Keywords: Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motor system; Consensus; Checklist; Reporting; Expert
Rights: Copyright © 2012 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.
RMID: 0020121014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.05.003
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications
View citing articles in: Web of Science
Google Scholar
Scopus

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

© 2008 The University of Adelaide
library@adelaide.edu.au
CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
Service Charter | Copyright | Privacy | Disclaimer