Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/73378
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurdon, P.en
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citationAlternative Law Journal, 2012; 37(2):82-85en
dc.identifier.issn1037-969Xen
dc.identifier.issn2398-9084en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/73378-
dc.description.abstractThis article critiques the draft Murray-Darling Basin Plan from the perspective of an emerging theory of law termed Earth Jurisprudence. While the Draft Plan purports to be concerned with ecological management, this paper argues that it actually legitimizes the continued exploitation of the Murray-Darling. Next, the paper considers an alternative approach to ecosystem management that is based on the scientific concept of ‘Ecological Integrity’. This approach views the Murray-Darling as an interconnected hole and demands that its ecological needs receive the highest priority.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPeter D. Burdonen
dc.description.urihttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2067995en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLegal Service Bulletin Co. Ltd.en
dc.rightsCopyright status unknownen
dc.subjectMurray-Darling River system; environmental policy; environmental law; earth jurisprudence; wild law; water lawen
dc.titleEarth jurisprudence and the Murray-Darling: the future of a riveren
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020120411en
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1037969X1203700203en
dc.identifier.pubid24008-
pubs.library.collectionLaw publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidBurdon, P. [0000-0003-0967-4987]en
Appears in Collections:Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.