Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®|
|Title:||Using student-generated questions for student-centred assessment|
|Citation:||Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012; 37(4):439-452|
|Publisher:||Carfax Publishing Ltd|
|Department:||Faculty of Health Sciences|
|Tracey Papinczaka, Raymond Peterson, Awais Saleem Babri, Kym Ward, Vaughan Kippers & David Wilkinson|
|Abstract:||In small groups, medical students were involved in generating questions to contribute to an online item bank. This study sought to support collaborative question‐writing and enhance students' metacognitive abilities, in particular, their ability to self‐regulate learning and moderate understanding of subject material. The study focused on supporting students to write questions requiring higher order cognitive processes. End‐of‐year formal examinations comprised 25% student‐generated questions (SGQs), while mid‐year examination items were completely unseen. Data were gathered from repeated administration of a questionnaire and from examination results. No statistically significant changes were identified in self‐rated monitoring of understanding and regulation of learning. The activity of generating questions supported students to work collaboratively in developing questions and answers. The bank of questions was appreciated by students as a source of revision material, even though it was not strongly focused on higher order processes. Based on scores, it would appear that many students chose to memorise the question bank as a 'high‐yield' strategy for mark inflation, paradoxically favouring surface rather than deep learning. The study has not identified directly improvements in metacognitive capacity and this is an area for further investigation. Continual refinement of the study method will be undertaken, with an emphasis on education of students in developing questions addressing higher order cognitive processes. Although students may have memorised the questions and answers, there is no evidence that they do not understand the information.|
|Keywords:||assessment; small‐group learning; metacognition|
|Rights:||© 2012 Taylor & Francis|
|Appears in Collections:||Medical Sciences publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.