Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Evaluation of implementation of sentinel node biopsy in Australia|
|Citation:||ANZ Journal of Surgery, 2012; 82(7-8):541-547|
|Publisher:||Blackwell Science Asia|
|Trenna Morris, Neil Wetzig, Sue Sinclair, James Kollias and Helen Zorbas|
|Abstract:||BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been a major change in surgical technique for the management of early breast cancer. In June 2008, the National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre (NBOCC) released evidence-based guidelines for the use of SNB in Australia. During 2010, NBOCC undertook a cohort study to identify the extent to which clinical practice in Australia reflected the recommendations for use of SNB in the 6 months after release of the guidelines. METHODS: Records obtained from four datasets, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons National Breast Cancer Audit, New South Wales Central Cancer Registry, Victorian Cancer Registry and Medicare Benefits Schedule records, were analysed to determine the extent to which the four key guideline recommendations had been implemented. This was supplemented by an audit of written SNB protocols of a sample of pathology laboratories in Australia. RESULTS: Across all cohorts, between 78 and 83% of women in Australia with tumours < 3 cm had an SNB. Data were not available to indicate whether nodes were clinically negative. The likelihood of women having an SNB decreased outside the metropolitan regions, for women treated as public patients compared with private patients and as the size of the tumour increased. In 90% of procedures both preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with isotope and blue dye were used. CONCLUSION: The findings from the study confirm that best practice recommendations from the NBOCC guidelines for SNB were largely being implemented for women with early breast cancer in Australia within 6 months of their release.|
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Practice Guidelines as Topic
|Rights:||© 2012 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2012 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.