Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Could nuclear fission energy, etc., solve the greenhouse problem? The affirmative case|
|Citation:||Energy Policy, 2012; 42(C):4-8|
|Publisher:||Elsevier Sci Ltd|
|Barry W. Brook|
|Abstract:||For effective climate change mitigation, the global use of fossil fuels for electricity generation, transportation and other industrial uses, will need to be substantially curtailed this century. In a recent Viewpoint in Energy Policy, Trainer (2010) argued that non-carbon energy sources will be insufficient to meet this goal, due to cost, variability, energy storage requirements and other technical limitations. However, his dismissal of nuclear fission energy was cursory and inadequate. Here I argue that fossil fuel replacement this century could, on technical grounds, be achieved via a mix of fission, renewables and fossil fuels with carbon sequestration, with a high degree of electrification, and nuclear supplying over half of final energy. I show that the principal limitations on nuclear fission are not technical, economic or fuel-related, but are instead linked to complex issues of societal acceptance, fiscal and political inertia, and inadequate critical evaluation of the real-world constraints facing low-carbon alternatives.|
|Keywords:||Future scenario; Generation IV nuclear; Synfuels|
|Rights:||Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.|
|Appears in Collections:||Earth and Environmental Sciences publications|
Environment Institute Leaders publications
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.