Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/74810
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour
Author: Smith, C.
Levett, K.
Collins, C.
Jones, L.
Citation: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012; 2012(2):1-28
Publisher: Update Software Ltd
Issue Date: 2012
ISSN: 1469-493X
1469-493X
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Caroline A Smith, Kate M Levett, Carmel T Collins, Leanne Jones
Abstract: Background: Many women would like to avoid pharmacological or invasive methods of pain management in labour, and this may contribute towards the popularity of complementary methods of pain management. This review examined currently available evidence supporting the use of manual healing methods including massage and reflexology for pain management in labour. Objectives: To examine the effects of manual healing methods including massage and reflexology for pain management in labour on maternal and perinatal morbidity. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group’s Trials Register (30 June 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 2 of 4), MEDLINE (1966 to 30 June 2011), CINAHL (1980 to 30 June 2011), the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (30 June 2011), Chinese Clinical Trial Register (30 June 2011), Current Controlled Trials (30 June 2011), ClinicalTrials.gov, (30 June 2011) ISRCTN Register (30 June 2011), National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) (30 June 2011) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (30 June 2011). Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing manual healing methods with standard care, no treatment, other non-pharmacological forms of pain management in labour or placebo. Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We attempted to contact study authors for additional information. Main results: We included six trials, with data reporting on five trials and 326 women in the meta-analysis. We found trials for massage only. Less pain during labour was reported from massage compared with usual care during the first stage of labour (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.17 to -0.47), four trials, 225 women), and labour pain was reduced in one trial of massage compared with music (risk ratio (RR) 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.89, 101 women). One trial of massage compared with usual care found reduced anxiety during the first stage of labour (MD -16.27, 95% CI -27.03 to -5.51, 60 women). No trial was assessed as being at a low risk of bias for all quality domains. Authors’ conclusions: Massage may have a role in reducing pain, and improving women’s emotional experience of labour. However, there is a need for further research.
Keywords: Humans; Labor Pain; Massage; Music Therapy; Pregnancy; Female; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pain Management
Description: Extent: 45p.
Rights: Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration.
RMID: 0020118298
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub2
Appears in Collections:Paediatrics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.