Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDi Bartolomeo, A.en
dc.contributor.authorChapman, M.en
dc.contributor.authorZaknic, A.en
dc.contributor.authorSummers, M.en
dc.contributor.authorJones, K.en
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Q.en
dc.contributor.authorRayner, C.en
dc.contributor.authorHorowitz, M.en
dc.contributor.authorDeane, A.en
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care (Print Edition), 2012; 16(5):1-7en
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Studies in the critically ill that evaluate intragastric and post-pyloric delivery of nutrient have yielded conflicting data. A limitation of these studies is that the influence in the route of feeding on glucose absorption and glycaemia has not been determined. METHODS: In 68 mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, liquid nutrient (100 ml; 1 kcal/ml containing 3 g of 3-O-Methyl-D-glucopyranose (3-OMG), as a marker of glucose absorption), was infused into either the stomach (n = 24) or small intestine (n = 44) over six minutes. Blood glucose and serum 3-OMG concentrations were measured at regular intervals for 240 minutes and the area under the curves (AUCs) calculated for 'early' (AUC60) and 'overall' (AUC240) time periods. Data are presented as mean (95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: Glucose absorption was initially more rapid following post-pyloric, when compared with intragastric, feeding (3-OMG AUC60: intragastric 7.3 (4.3, 10.2) vs. post-pyloric 12.5 (10.1, 14.8) mmol/l.min; P = 0.008); however, 'overall' glucose absorption was similar (AUC240: 49.1 (34.8, 63.5) vs. 56.6 (48.9, 64.3) mmol/l.min; P = 0.31). Post-pyloric administration of nutrients was also associated with greater increases in blood glucose concentrations in the 'early' period (AUC60: 472 (425, 519) vs. 534 (501, 569) mmol/l.min; P = 0.03), but 'overall' glycaemia was also similar (AUC240: 1,875 (1,674, 2,075) vs. 1,898 (1,755, 2,041) mmol/l.min; P = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: In the critically ill, glucose absorption was similar whether nutrient was administered via a gastric or post-pyloric catheter. These data may have implications for the perceived benefit of post-pyloric feeding on nutritional outcomes and warrant further investigation.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAnna E. Di Bartolomeo, Marianne J. Chapman, Antony V. Zaknic, Matthew J. Summers, Karen L. Jones, Nam Q. Nguyen, Christopher K. Rayner, Michael Horowitz and Adam M. Deaneen
dc.publisherCurrent Science Inc.en
dc.rights© 2012 Di Bartolomeo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectPylorus; Humans; Critical Illness; Glucose; Blood Glucose; Enteral Nutrition; Retrospective Studies; Intestinal Absorption; Middle Aged; Female; Male; Gastric Absorptionen
dc.titleComparative effects on glucose absorption of intragastric and post-pyloric nutrient delivery in the critically illen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.library.collectionMedicine publicationsen
dc.identifier.orcidChapman, M. [0000-0003-0710-3283]en
dc.identifier.orcidJones, K. [0000-0002-1155-5816]en
dc.identifier.orcidNguyen, Q. [0000-0002-1270-5441]en
dc.identifier.orcidRayner, C. [0000-0002-5527-256X]en
dc.identifier.orcidHorowitz, M. [0000-0002-0942-0306]en
dc.identifier.orcidDeane, A. [0000-0002-7620-5577]en
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_76870.pdfPublished version263.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.