Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/76997
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Beasley, C. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Australian Feminist Studies, 2013; 28(75):108-124 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0816-4649 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1465-3303 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/76997 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper considers the location of Masculinity Studies within the Gender/Sexuality field. Such a location offers possibilities and problems for theorising and coalition, as well as for policy and curriculum development. Importantly, the three major subfields of Gender/Sexuality—Feminist, Sexuality and Masculinity Studies—are not simply commensurable bits that fit together neatly like pieces of a jigsaw. This paper concentrates upon potentially dissonant theoretical directions between the subfields with the aim of clarifying the issues at stake. The implications of this dissonance are of particular significance for the present positioning and future directions of Masculinity Studies. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Chris Beasley | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Routledge | - |
dc.rights | © 2013 Taylor & Francis | - |
dc.title | Mind the gap? Masculinity studies and contemporary gender/sexuality thinking | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/08164649.2013.761949 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Beasley, C. [0000-0002-6399-8475] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Politics publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RA_hdl_76997.pdf Restricted Access | Restricted Access | 185.03 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.