Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeasley, C.-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Feminist Studies, 2013; 28(75):108-124-
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers the location of Masculinity Studies within the Gender/Sexuality field. Such a location offers possibilities and problems for theorising and coalition, as well as for policy and curriculum development. Importantly, the three major subfields of Gender/Sexuality—Feminist, Sexuality and Masculinity Studies—are not simply commensurable bits that fit together neatly like pieces of a jigsaw. This paper concentrates upon potentially dissonant theoretical directions between the subfields with the aim of clarifying the issues at stake. The implications of this dissonance are of particular significance for the present positioning and future directions of Masculinity Studies.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityChris Beasley-
dc.rights© 2013 Taylor & Francis-
dc.titleMind the gap? Masculinity studies and contemporary gender/sexuality thinking-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.orcidBeasley, C. [0000-0002-6399-8475]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Politics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access185.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.