Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, R.en
dc.contributor.authorShannon, S.en
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Engineering Education, 2013; 38(4):359-369en
dc.description.abstractWhen blended learning is embraced to enhance learning in engineering (architectural), design and architecture, we argue it is a best-practice instructional mode. Blended learning is the seamless amalgamation of carefully selected online modules with face-to-face instruction. This paper evaluates case studies of the introduction of blended learning in these disciplines. It demonstrates that students who do not engage with blended learning are academically disadvantaged. Alignment of the blended mode of delivery and the mode of assessment is next considered. Two case studies of the introduction of blended modes of assessment, for improved student satisfaction with feedback, are evaluated. Finally, the reliance upon non-faculty to provide both blended learning and assessment is evaluated using qualitative research methods to establish the barriers to adoption of what is now considered best educational practice.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityRebecca Francis and Susan J. Shannonen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd.en
dc.rights© 2013 SEFIen
dc.subjectblended learning; engineering (architectural); design; architecture; learning outcomes; assessmenten
dc.titleEngaging with blended learning to improve students’ learning outcomesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.library.collectionArchitecture publicationsen
Appears in Collections:Architecture publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_77700.pdfRestricted Access262.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.