Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 2012; 7(1):1-21||en|
|dc.description||Extent: 21 p.||en|
|dc.description.abstract||In 2007 the Academy Award winning director of Shall We Dance released his new film, a critique of the Japanese criminal justice system from a wrongful conviction perspective. In this article, I use the film as a vehicle to serve three disparate goals. First, I provide the first legal critique of the film, a genre of legal scholarship developing over the past 15 years. Second, I use the film to reflect on criminal justice reforms in Japan, in particular the introduction of the Lay Judge System (quasi-jury saiban-in seido) from 2009. Third, I critically ask whether use of film as a legal text assists or distracts from my primary pedagogical objectives in teaching comparative Japanese law. I conclude with a cautious recommendation of I Just Didn’t Do It as legal cinema, as a catalyst for reform of the Japanese criminal justice system and as an educational text.||en|
|dc.publisher||Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG||en|
|dc.rights||© 2012 De Gruyter. All rights reserved.||en|
|dc.subject||Comparative law; law and film; criminal justice; legal education; Japanese law||en|
|dc.title||Reflections on I just didn't do it, the lay judge system, and legal education in and out of Japan||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Law publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.