Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/77887
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHajiali Afzali, H.-
dc.contributor.authorKarnon, J.-
dc.contributor.authorGray, J.-
dc.contributor.authorBeilby, J.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationMental Health in Family Medicine, 2012; 9(2):91-97-
dc.identifier.issn1476-4717-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/77887-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Depression is highly prevalent and has a considerable impact on the quality of life of affected individuals, and on healthcare resources. Evidence indicates that collaborative care models can improve patient outcomes within a primary care setting. The Primary Care Services Improvement Project (PCSIP) aims to investigate the costs and outcomes of different models of care for the management of patients with depression. These models have been defined based on the level of involvement of practice nurses in management processes within the primary care setting in Australia. This paper describes our study protocol and its progress. Methods: PCSIP is an observational study that will link retrospective data from a range of sources to estimate costs and intermediate outcomes (such as relapse rate) over a 3-year time horizon. The main sources of primary data include the medical records of patients held at participating practices and Medicare Australia. Initial report: We recruited 15 practices from a metropolitan area and allocated them to three models of care. Two hundred and sixty-one patients agreed to participate. Appropriate re-gression- based analyses will be used to evaluate the association between different models of care and patient-level outcomes while controlling for several covariates such as age and gender. Discussion/conclusions: This project will generate the knowledge required to promote investment in the most cost-effective initiatives, and to ensure that waste of resources due to the implementation of comparatively inefficient interventions is minimised. Given the scarcity of resources, the increasing costs of providing healthcare and the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, such research is essential. © 2012 Radcliffe Publishing.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityHossein Haji Ali Afzali, Jonathan Karnon, Jodi Gray, Justin Beilby-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherRadcliffe Publishing Ltd.-
dc.rights© 2012 Radcliffe Publishing-
dc.source.urihttp://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=83201773&site=ehost-live&scope=site-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectdepression-
dc.subjecteconomic evaluation-
dc.subjectincentive programmes-
dc.titleEvaluation of collaborative models of care in the management of patients with depression: protocol and progress-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidHajiali Afzali, H. [0000-0002-0198-8394]-
dc.identifier.orcidKarnon, J. [0000-0003-3220-2099]-
dc.identifier.orcidGray, J. [0000-0002-1119-7078]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.