Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Discursive constructions of infant feeding: the dilemma of mothers' 'guilt'
Author: Williams, K.
Kurz, T.
Summers, M.
Crabb, S.
Citation: Feminism and Psychology, 2013; 23(3):339-358
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 1461-7161
Statement of
Kate Williams, Tim Kurz, Marker Summers and Shona Crabb
Abstract: Recent feminist and sociological scholarship has problematised the underlying medical assumptions in the established literature on infant feeding by attending to the social and discursive construction of breastfeeding practice. Such work has suggested that the pervasive cultural discourse around breastfeeding as the ‘morally correct’ choice has implications for actual decisions and practices as well as subjective judgements and feelings, particularly those of guilt and inadequacy. The present study employs a discursive approach to analyse the ways in which childcare materials published since 2000 construct the issue of infant feeding. In particular, we focus upon the ways in which these materials attend to the possible implications of pro-breastfeeding discourses for mothers’ subjective experience of guilt. We highlight a focus within the materials on not ‘feeling’ guilty, as opposed to affirmations that formula feeding mothers are not guilty. The complex and potentially problematic nature of such public health messages in terms of gendered subjectivities is considered.
Keywords: Breastfeeding
public health
Rights: © The Author(s) 2012
DOI: 10.1177/0959353512444426
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.