Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Radiation treatment compliance in the Indigenous population: the pilot Northern Territory experience and future directions
Author: Le, H.
Penniment, M.
Carruthers, S.
Roos, D.
Sullivan, T.
Baxi, S.
Citation: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 2013; 57(2):218-221
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 1754-9477
Statement of
Hien Le, Michael Penniment, Scott Carruthers, Daniel Roos, Thomas Sullivan and Siddhartha Baxi
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: There is a perception that Indigenous patients are less likely to attend radiotherapy treatment. This study sought to determine if a difference in radiotherapy treatment compliance rates exists between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients. Secondly, we aimed to ascertain which patient, disease and treatment factors affect compliance in Indigenous patients. METHODS: All patients treated with radiotherapy at the Alan Walker Cancer Care Centre between March and October 2010 were analysed. Data regarding compliance rates (defined as those who chose and completed the recommended course of treatment), patient, disease and treatment factors were collected, and chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests were applied. RESULTS: A total of 41 courses were delivered to Indigenous patients and 224 courses delivered to non-Indigenous patients in this period. There was no difference in compliance between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients (83% vs. 81%, P = 0.75). Of the factors assessed, it was found that there was an association between toxicity grade and compliance (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: From this cohort, we cannot support the perception that Indigenous patients have overall poorer compliance with recommended radiation treatment courses. In this study, the only factor which correlated significantly with compliance was toxicity grade. It is felt that a number of factors, which negatively impact on compliance, can potentially be counteracted by a culturally sensitive model of care.
Keywords: Gynaecology
head and neck
politics (medical/radiological)
Rights: © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology © 2013 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists
DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12010
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.