Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/79567
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRajiv, S.en
dc.contributor.authorHarding, M.en
dc.contributor.authorBassiouni, A.en
dc.contributor.authorJardeleza, C.en
dc.contributor.authorDrilling, A.en
dc.contributor.authorJames, C.en
dc.contributor.authorHa, T.en
dc.contributor.authorMoratti, S.en
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, S.en
dc.contributor.authorWormald, P.en
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationActa Neurochirurgica, 2013; 155(7):1361-1366en
dc.identifier.issn0001-6268en
dc.identifier.issn0942-0940en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/79567-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Achieving and maintaining haemostasis is of paramount importance in neurosurgery. Chitosan has been shown in both animal and human models to be significantly effective in haemostasis as well as in reducing adhesion formation. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the haemostatic potential and to study histopathological changes caused by novel chitosan dextran gel in a neurosurgical sheep model. METHOD Ten sheep underwent neurosurgical burr hole procedure. Bleeding control was tested at the level of bone, dura and brain separately with both chitosan gel and Gelfoam paste on separate burr holes. Baseline bleeding was measured at the time of injury using the Boezaart scale, and then every 2 min after the application of each agent until complete haemostasis or 10 min, whichever was earlier. Safety was assessed through MRI scans and histopathological analysis. RESULTS Mixed modeling showed no statistical difference in time to haemostasis between chitosan gel and Gelfoam paste (means of log-normalized areas under the curve were 1.3688 and 1.3196 respectively) for each burr hole (p  = 0.7768). Logistic regression modeling showed that Chitosan significantly decreased the incidence of bleeding beyond the first time point measured after application of the treatment when compared to Gelfoam (OR = 2.7, p = 0.04). Average edema volume (cm3) on post-operative MRI was 0.97 for Gelfoam and 1.11 for (p = 0.49) while average histology scores were 2.5 for Gelfoam versus 3.3 for chitosan (p = 0.32). CONCLUSION Chitosan dextran gel is an effective haemostatic agent to control bleeding in brain tissue. It is safe and nontoxic to neural tissue.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySukanya Rajiv, Marguerite Harding, Ahmed Bassiouni, Camille Jardeleza, Amanda Drilling, Craig James, Thanh Ha, Steve Moratti, Simon Robinson, Peter-John Wormalden
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag Wienen
dc.rights© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013en
dc.subjectChitosan; dextran; neurosurgery; haemostasis; sheep; gelfoam; brain; duraen
dc.titleThe efficacy and safety of chitosan dextran gel in a burr hole neurosurgical sheep modelen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020130356en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00701-013-1767-0en
dc.identifier.pubid18904-
pubs.library.collectionSurgery publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidBassiouni, A. [0000-0002-5545-0194]en
dc.identifier.orcidWormald, P. [0000-0001-7753-7277]en
Appears in Collections:Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.