Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/80154
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaghurst, P.en
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2013; 53(1):3-8en
dc.identifier.issn0004-8666en
dc.identifier.issn1479-828Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/80154-
dc.description.abstract<h4>Background</h4>The incidence of severe perineal tears acquired during vaginal childbirth varies considerably across hospitals but its use as a safety and quality indicator is in jeopardy because of problems associated with accurate detection and recording.<h4>Aim</h4>To understand and interpret time trends in the incidence of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among women giving birth vaginally in 18 public maternity hospitals in South Australia, taking into account individualised risk factors for each birth.<h4>Methods</h4>The risk-adjusted probability of a third- and fourth-degree tear was estimated for each of 65,598 singleton vaginal births (2002-2008), using a previously published regression model. The risk factors for each birth included maternal age; parity and ethnicity; assistance with instruments and episiotomy; shoulder dystocia; and infant birthweight. Plots of 'excess' tears were generated to help identify maternity services where the observed incidence of severe trauma differed from the expectation estimated from the risk profiles.<h4>Results</h4>Three hospitals were identified at which there were systematically more tears than expected (given their risk profiles), and five hospitals were identified at which there were fewer tears. However, increased tearing at two hospitals coincided closely with improved advocacy for better detection and treatment of perineal tears (especially partial third-degree tears).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Statistical process control methods provide a powerful means of investigating temporal variations in the incidence of outcomes like severe perineal tears. Third- or fourth- degree tears should be retained as a quality indicator of maternity services, but it is likely that many third-degree tears currently go undetected.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPeter A. Baghursten
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Asiaen
dc.rights© 2012 The Authoren
dc.subjectbenchmarking; obstetric anal sphincter injury; perineal tears; statistical process control monitoringen
dc.titleThe case for retaining severe perineal tears as an indicator of the quality of obstetric careen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajo.12014en
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Paediatrics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.