Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/80516
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Housing affordability and mental health: does the relationship differ for renters and home purchasers?
Author: Mason, K.
Baker, E.
Blakely, T.
Bentley, R.
Citation: Social Science & Medicine, 2013; 94:91-97
Publisher: Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 0277-9536
1873-5347
Organisation: Centre for Housing, Urban and Regional Planning (CHURP)
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Kate E. Mason, Emma Baker, Tony Blakely, Rebecca J. Bentley
Abstract: There is increasing evidence of a direct association between unaffordable housing and poor mental health, over and above the effects of general financial hardship. Type of housing tenure may be an important factor in determining how individuals experience and respond to housing affordability problems. This study investigated whether a relationship exists between unaffordable housing and mental health that differs for home purchasers and private renters among low-income households. Data from 2001 to 2010 of the longitudinal Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey were analysed using fixed-effects linear regression to examine change in the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score of individuals aged 25-64 years, associated with changes in housing affordability, testing for an interaction with housing tenure type. After adjusting for age, survey year and household income, among individuals living in households in the lower 40% of the national income distribution, private renters in unaffordable housing experienced somewhat poorer in mental health than when their housing was affordable (difference in MCS = -1.18 or about 20% of one S.D. of the MCS score; 95% CI: -1.95,-0.41; p = 0.003) while home purchasers experienced no difference on average. The statistical evidence for housing tenure modifying the association between unaffordable housing and mental health was moderate (p = 0.058). When alternatives to 40% were considered as income cut-offs for inclusion in the sample, evidence of a difference between renters and home purchasers was stronger amongst households in the lowest 50% of the income distribution (p = 0.020), and between the 30th and 50th percentile (p = 0.045), with renters consistently experiencing a decline in mental health while mean MCS scores of home purchasers did not change. In this study, private renters appeared to be more vulnerable than home purchasers to mental health effects of unaffordable housing. Such a modified effect suggests that tenure-differentiated policy responses to poor housing affordability may be appropriate.
Keywords: Australia; Housing affordability; Housing tenure; Mental health; Longitudinal survey
Rights: Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
RMID: 0020131314
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.023
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP100200182
Appears in Collections:Centre for Housing, Urban and Regional Planning publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_80516.pdfRestricted Access187.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.