Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/80682
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQutob, A.en
dc.contributor.authorGue, S.en
dc.contributor.authorRevesz, T.en
dc.contributor.authorLogan, R.en
dc.contributor.authorKeefe, D.en
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationOral Oncology, 2013; 49(2):102-107en
dc.identifier.issn1368-8375en
dc.identifier.issn1879-0593en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/80682-
dc.description.abstractThis systematic review investigated, critically appraised, and rated the evidence on agents used to prevent oral mucositis in children. A comprehensive search of the relevant literature was performed up to December 2011. Articles were included according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were critically appraised for validation and quality assessment using a checklist consisting of 18 categories. Each article was then rated for its strength of evidence. 16,471 articles were retrieved from 19 different databases and then reduced to 27 articles that fit the inclusion criteria. Five articles on oral care protocols supported their use to prevent oral mucositis in children. Seven articles on chlorhexidine mouthwash and three on laser therapy had conflicting evidence of its use. The preventative agents that were supported by one or two articles included: benzydamine mouthwash, iseganan mouthwash, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) mouthwash, oral/enteral glutamine, oral propantheline and cryotherapy, oral cryotherapy, oral sucralfate suspension, prostaglandin E2 tablets, and chewing gum. The reduction in the rates of occurrence of oral mucositis when using agents of fair (B) to good (A) evidence ranged from 22% to 52%. In conclusion, this review suggests the use of oral care protocols to prevent oral mucositis in children because of their strength of evidence (fair to good). The authors suggest avoiding agents with fair to good evidence against their use (oral sucralfate suspension, prostaglandin E2 tablets, and GM-CSF mouthwash). Agents with conflicting evidence (chlorhexidine mouthwash (used solely), laser therapy, and glutamine) should also be avoided until further research confirms their efficacy.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAkram F. Qutob, Sumant Gue, Tamas Revesz, Richard M. Logan, Dorothy Keefeen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltden
dc.rightsCrown Copyright © 2012en
dc.subjectPrevention; Children; Oral mucositis; Evidence; Systematic review; Childhood cancer; Chemotherapy; Radiotherapy; Pediatric oncologyen
dc.titlePrevention of oral mucositis in children receiving cancer therapy: a systematic review and evidence-based analysisen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020124668en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.08.008en
dc.identifier.pubid21728-
pubs.library.collectionDentistry publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidRevesz, T. [0000-0003-2501-0259]en
dc.identifier.orcidLogan, R. [0000-0002-9331-1814]en
dc.identifier.orcidKeefe, D. [0000-0001-9377-431X]en
Appears in Collections:Dentistry publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.