Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/82299
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility
Author: Farquhar, C.
Moore, V.
Bhattacharya, S.
Blake, D.
Vail, A.
Thomas, J.
Cheong, Y.
Showell, M.
Nagels, H.
Marjorbanks, J.
Citation: Human Reproduction, 2013; 28(11):2883-2892
Publisher: Oxford Univ Press
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 0268-1161
1460-2350
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Cindy Farquhar, Vivienne Moore, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Debbie Blake, Andy Vail, Jane Thomas, Ying Cheong, Marian Showell, Helen Nagels, Jane Marjoribanks, on behalf of the Cochrane Editorial Board of the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group
Abstract: The past three decades have seen considerable change in the understanding of clinical research methods. There has been an acceptance that RCTs are the best way of establishing treatment effectiveness and a recognition that, while single studies are useful, pooling knowledge from a complete body of work is likely to provide the best evidence. Advances in methodology have been mirrored by the many advances in the field of reproductive medicine, such as assisted reproduction, assessment of male fertility, ovulation induction and laparoscopic surgery. Together, they have led to welcome improvements in the outcomes of fertility treatments. In particular, systematic reviews have become important tools enabling clinicians and patients to make health-care decisions based on evidence from all the available high-quality studies. The move towards identifying and aggregating the highest quality evidence has been led by the Cochrane Collaboration, which this year celebrates 20 years of preparing and publishing systematic reviews. This paper outlines the achievements, progress and challenges of this enterprise to date, with a particular focus on systematic reviews of reproductive medicine.
Keywords: Cochrane reviews
menstrual disorders
subfertility
assisted reproduction
systematic reviews
Rights: © The Author 2013.
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det334
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.