Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Differential actions of adenosine A₁ and A₂A antagonists on the effort-related effects of dopamine D₂ antagonism|
|Other Titles:||Differential actions of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) antagonists on the effort-related effects of dopamine D(2) antagonism|
|Citation:||Behavioural Brain Research, 2009; 201(1):216-222|
|Publisher:||Elsevier Science BV|
|John D. Salamone, Andrew M. Farrar, Laura Font, Vatsal Patel, Devra E. Schlar, Eric J. Nunes, Lyndsey E. Collins, Thomas N. Sager|
|Abstract:||Adenosine and dopamine receptors in striatal areas interact to regulate a number of different functions, including aspects of motor control and motivation. Recent studies indicate that adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists can reverse the effects of dopamine (DA) D(2) antagonists on instrumental tasks that provide measures of effort-related choice behavior. The present experiments compared the ability of the adenosine A(2A) antagonist KW6002, the nonselective adenosine antagonist caffeine, and the adenosine A(1) receptor selective antagonist DPCPX, to reverse the behavioral effects of the DA D(2) antagonist haloperidol. For these studies, a concurrent choice procedure was used in which rats could select between lever pressing on a fixed ratio 5 schedule for a preferred food or approaching and consuming a less preferred lab chow that was concurrently available in the chamber. Under baseline or control conditions, rats show a strong preference for lever pressing, and eat little of the chow; IP injections of 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol significantly reduced lever pressing and substantially increased chow intake. The adenosine A(2A) antagonist KW6002 (0.125-0.5 mg/kg IP) and the nonselective adenosine antagonist caffeine (5.0-20.0 mg/kg) significantly reversed the effects of haloperidol. However, the adenosine A(1) antagonist DPCPX (0.1875-0.75 mg/kg IP) failed to reverse the effects of the D(2) antagonist. The rank order of effect sizes in the reversal experiments was KW6002>caffeine>DPCPX. None of these drugs had any effect on behavior when they were injected in the absence of haloperidol. These results indicate that the ability of an adenosine antagonist to reverse the effort-related effects of a D(2) antagonist depends upon the subtype of adenosine receptor being blocked. Together with other recent results, these experiments indicate that there is a specific interaction between DA D(2) and adenosine A(2A) receptors, which could be related to the co-localization of these receptors on the same population of striatal neurons.|
|Keywords:||Operant; Reinforcement; Motivation; Behavioral economics; Reward; Decision making; Activation; Depression; Psychomotor slowing; Anergia|
|Rights:||© 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.|
|Appears in Collections:||Medical Sciences publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.